The Climate Change 'Debate'

As an Earth Science teacher for many years before becoming involved in elementary science, I have always been interested in long term climate change. I have steered away from the term 'global warming' and have shuddered when the term 'greenhouse effect' was used to describe insolation trapping gases. I am a fan of James Lovelock and his 'Gaia' feedback mechanisms, which make the issue of climate change more complex but still understandable in a fundamental way. The political issue revolves around whether humans are in some way responsible for climate change, and therefore obligated to put it right. I don't care for that reasoning, because even if we do make a short term change, the global feedback mechanisms will correct those changes in non-human time scales. But, this begs the question of whether humankind should pillage fossil fuel resources, terraform for precious metals, and produce radioactive waste for our own short term excesses. In the US, it is clear that the consumption path is not a good economic choice, and beyond that, the impact on daily city life of carbon pollution may spoil the Olympics in China. It is rather self serving to suggest that climate change isn't an issue: us humans need to respect that we are 1. part of a greater bio/geochemical system 2. in need of the flexibility to change our lifestyles to accommodate cooling or warming 3. in need of greater understanding of climate feedback systems like el Nino/la Nina 4. becoming ignorant of the basic sciences necessary to deal with changing weather and climate. As a teacher of elementary students, I feel it is more important to give them the tools to understand weather and climate than to burden them with the politics of the issue. Climate variability has been a culture changing event for the Anasazi, North Africans, Romans, Vikings, Easter Islanders, and potentially many other groups. Climate change is a historical and present reality which needs our student's attention free from pay per view polemics and popular hype. The 'debate' is over how society should behave with regard to using resources: do we use them sparingly and in a respectful manner for the benefit of future generations, or do we justify their exploitation for immediate consumption with little regard for any future humans or other living things on Earth?

'No brainer' for me.